What Statement Did The Singapore Police Force Give Regarding The Investigation Into Zubeen Garg’s Death In Singapore?

 
	        
	        
	    
The SPF’s release aimed to provide transparency while urging the public to avoid spreading unverified information about the incident.
On October 17, 2025, at 1:00 PM, the Public Affairs Department of the Singapore Police Force issued an official statement addressing ongoing public discussions and misinformation regarding the death of Zubeen Garg.
Investigation Under the Coroners Act (2010):
The case is being investigated in accordance with Singapore’s Coroners Act 2010, which governs the process of investigating unnatural or unexplained deaths.
No Suspicion of Foul Play (Preliminary Findings):
Based on preliminary investigations, the SPF does not suspect foul play in Zubeen Garg’s death. However, the inquiry remains open and ongoing, pending further evidence and procedural reviews.
Autopsy Report Shared with Indian Authorities:
On October 1, 2025, the Singapore Police Force shared a copy of the autopsy report and preliminary findings with the High Commission of India in Singapore, upon their official request.
Submission to the State Coroner:
Once the investigation is complete, the SPF will submit its findings to the State Coroner, who will then determine whether to hold a Coroner’s Inquiry (CI).
A Coroner’s Inquiry is a fact-finding judicial process, conducted by a Coroner, to determine the cause and circumstances of death.
The Coroner’s findings will be made public once the inquiry concludes.
Timeline for Completion:
The SPF noted that the investigation may take up to three more months, emphasizing that thorough and professional investigations require time and accuracy.
Appeal for Patience and Avoidance of Rumors:
The SPF urged the public and media to refrain from speculation or sharing unverified claims online. It reiterated its commitment to a transparent and professional investigation.
Understanding the Coroner’s Inquiry Process in Singapore
Under the Coroners Act 2010, Singapore’s legal framework mandates that unexplained or unnatural deaths be investigated through a structured judicial process.
Police Investigation: The SPF collects evidence, conducts autopsies, and interviews witnesses.
Submission to Coroner: Findings are submitted to the State Coroner once investigations conclude.
Coroner’s Inquiry (if required):
The Coroner, a judicial officer, examines evidence to determine the cause and circumstances of death.
The inquiry is non-criminal and fact-finding in nature.
Its conclusions are made public to ensure transparency.
In Zubeen Garg’s case, the SPF has clarified that this process will be followed meticulously before any final statement on cause of death is made.
While Singapore Police handle the case abroad, the Assam Criminal Investigation Department (CID) has launched a separate inquiry at home. Several individuals, including Zubeen’s associates, have been interrogated and placed in judicial custody.
The dual investigations aim to ensure that both the international and domestic legal systems address all possible aspects surrounding the case.
The SPF’s statement has brought some clarity but has not slowed down public demand for answers. The hashtag #JusticeForZubeenGarg continues to trend across social media, with millions calling for justice, truth, and transparency.
Supporters emphasize that while emotional outpouring is natural, the legal process must take its course through proper investigation and judicial review.
The Singapore Police Force’s statement serves as a reminder of the need for patience, factual accuracy, and respect for due process. The agency reiterated that its investigation is ongoing and that the final findings will be public once the Coroner completes the inquiry.
In summary, the SPF seeks:
Patience from the public.
Trust in professional and legal procedures.
Restraint from speculation or misinformation.
As investigations continue in both Singapore and Assam, the official position of the Singapore Police Force remains clear — no foul play is suspected at this stage, but the case remains under active investigation.
The final outcome will depend on evidence-based findings and the Coroner’s Inquiry process, ensuring that justice, truth, and transparency prevail.
Until then, both authorities and supporters alike continue to echo one message — let the investigation speak through facts, not rumors.